Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Ried

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, nominator withdrawn. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 23:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Ried (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Despite numerous google returns, none seem to mention her beyond the pornography itself. The one cited reference is about the only source that mentions her otherwise, and winning this single reward does not make her notable Jimmi Hugh 17:24, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Per WP:PORNBIO criteria 1: "Performer has won or been a serious contender for a well-known award." Tabercil 17:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment How can you justify calling FAME notable when it doesnt even have an article. -- Jimmi Hugh 17:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Hadn't noticed that... it is only in it's second year. Off to fix that. Tabercil 17:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 17:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per Tabercil - FAME Award gives notability Corpx 17:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• For what its worth, she also won a "more prestigious" AVN Award Corpx 17:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the "award" mentioned above is "FAME Award for Favorite Female Rookie", according to the article. Not notable enough, and an example of why PORNBIO is pretty shaky indeed. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:58, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The FAME Awards are the most notable fan's choice awards, which possibly makes them the best measure of who the most well known pornstars are. Epbr123 19:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per AVN & FAME Awards. Epbr123 19:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, she's won notable awards, and thus meets WP:PORNBIO criterion #1. (And I should point out: Just because something's not on Wikipedia doesn't mean it's not notable). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 20:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Apologies for the rushed nomination then... Admin should probably Snowfall Keep this. -- Jimmi Hugh 21:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll just ignore all rules and close it even though I'm no admin. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 23:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.