Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amulet of Yendor
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge. Sr13 (T|C) ER 03:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Amulet of Yendor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article not verifiable through reliable sources. Makes no assertion of notability. JimmyBlackwing 07:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Nethack. while the object itself is quite famous in MUD worlds it might not need an own article, Merge it into Nethack and put a redirect to it. --Jestix 07:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Rogue (computer game), which had it before Nethack. I'm pretty sure that sources could be found if necessary (including literal "sources" - source code!) but that's probably unnecessary for an article this short and this mergeable. Zetawoof(ζ) 10:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as above if a source can be found, else delete. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Rogue (computer game), though arguments to keep could probably be made. Seems to be a staple item in Roguelikes, for example. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 16:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per the other users who said to merge. Acalamari 20:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above ffm ✎talk 13:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Regarding the above two comments... Merge to where? So far we have Merge to Nethack and Merge to Rogue. Which is it? Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 16:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The Amulet of Yendor appears not only in a variety of roguelike games, but in technical culture (eg: User Friendly) and was even the title of a 1986 roguelike DOS game. --Pjf 15:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.