Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amr El-Shamy

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A mention on the Adobe Photoshop article would not be untoward, but there's not enough significant lasting coverage for a standalone article. ♠PMC(talk) 14:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amr El-Shamy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is insufficient evidence of notability of this individual. There are brief mentions in local news for a single event only (WP:BLP1E). There may be a conflict of interest as well, as the page creator is a single-purpose account. Deli nk (talk) 21:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Create magazine and Behance (a self-promotion site) are both owned by Adobe. None of the other sources are in-depth critical assessments of his work as an artist, they're all about a single event; the selection of one of his works as the splash screen for Adobe Photoshop. In a way, he has created a well-known work, but we also require that such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. That is not the case here. Mduvekot (talk) 22:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete lacks good sources to establish notability. Authoring an Adoble splash screen is an inconsequential achievement.104.163.140.99 (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.