Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amor Puro (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This certainly isn't a keep with only two opinions, however, at the state of being relisted twice this is pretty much a contested PROD. I'm going to close this as no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 18:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amor Puro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete and redirect to Drama Queen (Ivy Queen album) as it fails WP:NSONG. The article has lots of references, but many don't mention the song at all (e.g. The Daily News here), and almost all that do mention it are really about the album, and the song is in passing or in a sidebar listing. The only two sources that I identified as being about the song were two de facto press releases rehashed here and here. The song has not been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts. It did not win any significant awards or honors. It has not been independently released as a recording by other notable artists. This article was previously afded in May 2012, with the result to delete. --Bejnar (talk) 20:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. First, let's not that the article appeared at DYK on 23 May 2013. Notability was brought up there, however was ok'd. The argument made there was "The song partly fails WP:SONGS because it hasn't charted. But, it has enough coverage in reliable third party sources. Seven of the 15 are primarily on the song while at least three others mention the song including a review from Allmusic." Thank you for your interest in the article. —DivaKnockouts 21:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the seven citations that "are primarily on the song"? There are the two PR-style ones for the video that I mentioned above. What are the other five? --Bejnar (talk) 22:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's reference number one titled "Ivy Queen lanza el segundo single de "Drama Queen" (Ivy Queen release the second single from "Drama Queen". The two you mentioned, reference number eleven titled "Ivy Queen graba nuevo video musical en Miami" (Ivy Queen records new music video in Miami). Number 18 is a dead link. Reference number 19 titled "Ivy Queen entrega Amor Puro" (Ivy Queen gives Amor Puro). Which are entirely on the song. Several others mention the song's recording, composition and music video. Allmusic even selects the song as an "Album pick" and calls the song "uplifting" in the album review. And.I don't know if this warrants anything, but the music video does have over four million views on YouTube. —DivaKnockouts 19:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Press releases are not significant coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 19:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. --Bejnar (talk) 20:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. --Bejnar (talk) 20:49, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.