Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amol goel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:46, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amol goel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. References cited do not indicate significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources. [1] is a non-notable blog. [2] mentions 8 instagram profiles, one of which is a community started by the subject. [3] is about people who have been affected by Delhi's vehicular pollution control rules, and names him as one of the several people surveyed by the reporter. [4] is part of a series that covers several notable and non-notable Indian startups -- it's an account of the subject's startup, based on his interview. Besides these, there are around ~4000 Google results, most of them social media accounts or about other people with the same name. utcursch | talk 23:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC) utcursch | talk 23:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. utcursch | talk 23:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 04:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:BLP with no noticeable claim of encyclopedic notability. Fails WP:GNG. Vipinhari || talk 04:55, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:BLP some coverage of the startup and the instagram account, but not notable. Chris vLS (talk) 04:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.