Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Al Bahar : Muawiyah RA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 16:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Al Bahar : Muawiyah RA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable documentary. The references, except the YouTube video, are either Wikipedia itself or predate the documentary by a couple of centuries. Huon (talk) 22:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

know reference from the book Islam's Reformers added — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salmannaseem07 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - we already have a well-developed article on Muawiyah I, based on better sources. I take it this is an article not about Muawiyah I but about the documentary (otherwise it would qualify for speedy deletion). Thus we'd need sources discussing the documentary. The book does not do so. Huon (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Muawiyah I- ArtsRescuer • Talk me 11:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete instead as there's nothing significant to suggest better or moving, it can be mentioned however briefly but there's simply nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 23:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Much as I'm normally loathe to agree with Swister Twister (no harsh feelings ^_^) I have to agree. The documentary appears to be completely non-notable, not even worth a mention in the main article. Of course, if someone could find a magazine article about the documentary, or a professional review of the documentary, I'd be willing to reconsider my vote (to keep, not merge). But as far as I can tell, these reviews about the documentary do not exist, and so we should delete. Fieari (talk) 23:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.