Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amine Gülşe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep(non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amine Gülşe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources. Looks to fail WP:BLP1E, as she only took part in one event (Miss World 2014) and a local preliminary round (Miss World Turkey 2014). Also looks to fail WP;GNG as the original 340k Google hits boil down to a mere 270. The Banner talk 17:26, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 22:14, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per below - Seems to pass GNG after all .–Davey2010^Talk 13:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - she genuinely appears to be well-known (notable) in Turkey as a model and actress; see here. Bearian (talk) 01:04, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as subject appears to cross the verifiability and notability thresholds both as a titleholder ([1], [2], [3], [4], etc.) and as an actress in a hit Turkish television series ([5], [6], [7], etc.) to meet WP:GNG. - Dravecky (talk) 12:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay.... that is a good challenge of my nomination. Let us make a tiny deal: when you add her work as an actress to the article, than I will pull this nomination. The Banner talk 12:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've added several references from two of Turkey's leading newspapers to the article, as requested. My Turkish isn't good enough to do much expansion on the article but I've added a small bit to the text. - Dravecky (talk) 13:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request speedy close as keep as nominator now that proof has been given that she has notability outside the one event originally mentioned in the article. The Banner talk 14:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.