Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambuli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 18:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ambuli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The film does not yet exist and has no planned release date and consequently the article appears to fail to meet WP:NFF. PROD quickly removed without explanation (along with all earlier improvement notices) so raising for wider discussion. Though the publicity blurb claims this is the "first Stereoscopic Tamil 3D Thriller", this seems a weak rationale for an exception to NFF, particularly as there is no claim that this is first 3D film available in Tamil or the first 3D thriller with Tamil subtitles or dubbed. Fæ (talk) 10:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 10:46, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 10:47, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON#Films. Its minimal coverage[1] might merit it a metion in the director's article, but not yet as an seperate article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NFF "going on floors today" and the shooting of ‘Ambuli’ starts from today is Indian English-speak for "filming has begun". This is a notable production with a notable Tamil star in the lead. More mainstream media coverage on the filming - [2][3]. I have seen tv coverage too. Its actually the first 3d film to be made in Tamil in 23 years and they are twisting it to say "first 3d film" ever (there were a few attempts in the 80s like elsewhere in the world)--Sodabottle (talk) 09:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sodabottle. Struck my earlier !vote. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 12:13, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.