Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambar Sengupta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ambar Sengupta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't look like meeting WP:NPROF, WP:GNG, WP:RS. The article does not cite any independent sources. Looking at the citation indexes in Scopus [1] not enough for meeting WP:NACADEMIC#Specific_criteria_notes. RationalPuff (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The named professorship at LSU looks like a pass of WP:NPROF C5. The citation record also looks like a potential weak pass of WP:NPROF C1. The article could use some trimming, but doesn't look so bad as for WP:TNT. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 18:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I can't find enough reviews of his three books (Pricing Derivatives, Gauge Theory on Compact Surfaces, and Representing Finite Groups: A Semisimple Introduction) to convince me of a pass of WP:AUTHOR, and his citation record is borderline. But the named professorship is enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I don't believe the subject is either a named chair or distinguished professor. So I don't see how it satisfy WP:NPROF C5. RationalPuff (talk) 19:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You don't believe the sources saying he was named Hubert Butts Alumni Professor? Or you don't believe that the professorship named as the Hubert Butts Alumni Professor is a named professorship? —David Eppstein (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The name professorship is significant, and the citation records appears plausible enough for Mathematics.--Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 18:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes NPROF C5, named professorship. Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 03:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets WP:NPROF. 11:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhawangupta (talk • contribs)
• Keep as named professorship. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.