Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Lexx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 16:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Lexx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not notable. Epbr123 00:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of Porn star deletions. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 01:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete From what I can see there is no notability here. Possibly could have been speedied since there is no clear claim of notability. --Wildnox(talk) 01:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep after the recent reworking. --Wildnox(talk) 02:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-notable. Mwelch 01:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Week keep now that there is an assertion of notability. Playboy is obviously a big name, so I suppose that hosting a show on their TV channel would be of note. Mwelch 07:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Article was underdeveloped, but I have expanded it significantly, adding a couple of references as well as assertions to notability. She is a former host of a Playboy TV show and has posed for a large number of magazines in different genres. Previous voters, please re-assess.LaMenta3 02:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. I'm not sure about the notable, but if she had her own show on Playboy, then, well, that's a probable. clean it up. --Dennisthe2 02:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per Dennisthe2. Philippe Beaudette 03:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per Mwelch. Hosting a playboy show is notable enough, but just- article isn't really developed. CattleGirl ^{talk | sign! | review me} 08:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The subject is notable enough, the article just needs some improvements. Burntsauce 17:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete On following the links, the claim that "she had her own TV show" seems very misleading (even the bio on her own web site doesn't claim this, but just says "She has appeared on..."). Without this, her biggest claim to fame appears to be having had her photo in a European car magazine & being an extra on Baywatch. - Iridescenti 17:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep She seems notable to me. Acalamari 18:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep I pretty much agree with Burntsauce. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep It's got a few references now, I feel it passes, borderline however, the notability test. The Evil Clown _{Please review me!} 19:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the above. --Myles Long 21:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The article is reasonable now, and referenced. It establishes notability as far as I can tell; appearing on a TV show and in several major magazines is pretty notable. — Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 21:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The Playboy gig pretty much proves notability, though I never saw the show myself. (Darn!) Realkyhick 07:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable enough Captain panda In vino veritas 00:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.