Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternate
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 04:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Was tagged for Proposed deletion, but Netoholic swapped it for {{disambig}} instead. It's still a dictdef (which is Wiktionary, in a much better state) and some vaguely related articles, none of which would be at this title. Cleaning up the disambig per WP:MOSDAB would leave "'''Alternate''' may refer to: {{wiktionary}} {{disambig}}". —Cryptic (talk) 05:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The purpose of {{disambig}} is exactly as it sounds, and not to provide dictionary definitions; that's why Wiktionary exists. I don't see anyway to turn this into a useful page, as there's really no point in redirecting "alternate" to things like alternator and alternative music (we already have alternative (disambiguation) for that). --Kinu 06:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 10:26, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A transwiki would be pointless; there's already an entry there that wouldn't need massive cleanup and rewriting, as this would. —Cryptic (talk) 17:19, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete dicdef —Wahoofive (talk) 04:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a poor dictdef, not realy a dab page, and a better dictdef is already on wiktionary. DES (talk) 16:30, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.