Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alt Eisen/Alt Eisen Riese
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ~ L'Aquatique[talk] 04:49, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alt Eisen/Alt Eisen Riese
AfDs for this article:
- Alt Eisen/Alt Eisen Riese (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 15:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ghits returns about 190,000 hits about selling a model or a card for the subject, and no significant coverage by third party sources independent of the parent subject. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 15:50, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge The referenced article a important part of the gameplay. It , at last, may be merged. If we don't do so, the information will simply be lost, which is very wrong.MRFraga (talk) 19:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If it's so important, how come there are no third party sources describing it? I found only sale and some forums discussing the card or model? Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 19:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 16:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Excessive in-universe detail, does not conform to the WP:WAF guidelines, WP:Verifiability policy or WP:Notability guidelines. With regards to the information "simply being lost" - consider moving the information to a specific gaming wiki. Marasmusine (talk) 10:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lack of reliable third-party sources, thus failing WP:V and WP:N. Probably fails WP:GAMETRIVIA as well, since entire article devoted to weapons are generally not needed to convey a concise summary of the game's universe. Randomran (talk) 02:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A fictional weapon with no notability. -- nips (talk) 20:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.