Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Along Came The Chosen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Reks. No prejudice against selectively merging verifiable content. (non-admin closure) -- Trevj (talk) 08:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Along Came The Chosen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No content at all barring the tracklist, which means its level of notability is dubious at best. — foxj 08:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC) Added additional content Robert H Alpert 19:38, 22 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Therob006 (talk • contribs) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rob, you're just adding PR fluff to the articles rather than actually improving them... — foxj 05:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Σ τ c. 06:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect to Reks. Doesn't seem notable in itself. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Trevj (talk) 12:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relist comment This appears to deserve one last round here. Notability may be implied from these refs.[1][2], although not directly addressing the subject matter. As a debut album (likely notable within circles following the genre), it may meet WP:NALBUM with offline sources. Perhaps someone will step up and add such sources or request userfication until such sources can be included. -- Trevj (talk) 12:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Specific evidence for notability is very limited: it was Reks's first album, it received some positive reviews, it was nominated for an award. There is negligible published content to summarize in an article about this album (see WP:WHYN). A track listing is padding (see WP:NOTEVERYTHING #8). Redirect to Reks so readers searching for the album find a genuine encyclopedic summary. —Ben Kovitz (talk) 00:42, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.