Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allstate Crossbar Classic

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allstate Crossbar Classic

Allstate Crossbar Classic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of independent, secondary coverage. What coverage does exist simply quotes the press release announcing the inaugural game. Let'srun (talk) 20:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pointing out other articles is not a valid argument. The article on this particular game must stand or fall on its own merits. Frank Anchor 21:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:GNG. The only coverage in the article or on a Google search were WP:ROUTINE announcements that this particular, already scheduled game was going to become the first in a series of games under this nickname. Frank Anchor 22:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Outside ESPN and Learfield arranging a branding for it, this is a bog standard Tide home game and it'll be the same next year for whichever two teams they find to paste a logo on the field for. Nate (chatter) 00:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Unlike most kickoff games, it appears this isn't even a neutral site event — just a sponsorship deal applying this name to what otherwise would simply be a run-of-the-mill home game. Neutral site games, while not necessarily notable in and of themselves, at least have the potential of garnering the requisite significant coverage — there's almost no way that will ever happen with this one. WCQuidditch 02:52, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.