Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied Express

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Allied Express

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company article created and maintained by COI accounts. Literally every source in this article is either from the company's own website, their affiliates, or their press releases. A quick WP:BEFORE check turned up nothing substantial either. Does not meet WP:NCORP. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the reasons ably outlined by Yunshui. Worth noting ~~the article creator~~ a major contributor, User:Allied Express, was also blocked for spamming links to this article onto other pages as a fairly obvious means of business promotion. -- Euryalus (talk) 09:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the original creator was User:Aetwiki123, equally obvious as a role account. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 10:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 10:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- non notable with promo content, such as "Partnerships and charity support". Wikipedia is not a replacement for the corporate web site; basically spam. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTSPAM. There is a tidbit or so out there [1], but we need to be emphatic in rejecting spam like this. MER-C 11:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a real company and quite possibly notable; but the current article is spam and would need WP:TNT to be brought up to scratch. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Agree with nom, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.