Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And replace with disambiguation page. Sandstein 18:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If not deleted, this article should at least be split. Half of this article is a disambiguation page (The Alliance (professional wrestling), professional wrestling faction which ostensibly consisted of World Championship Wrestling and Extreme Championship Wrestling) and the other half are examples of alliances and the definition (Holy Alliance, coalition of Russia, Austria, and Prussia created in 1815) Dat GuyWiki (talk) 15:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of things based on whether they have the word "alliance" in the title, from NATO to The Alliance (The Office). I find it a bit sad that so many editors worked over so many years to assemble what I believe to be an utterly useless assemblage of what is basically Things that Have this Word in the Title. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:43, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and move Alliance (disambiguation) here. We already have Military alliance / List of military alliances and Political alliance (which has its own built-in list). Between them, many of the entries on this page are already covered. The rest are partial matches. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would merge with the disambiguation page - because that is essentially all it is. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Perhaps best is the best option here. SwisterTwister talk 06:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Given that a merge with Disambiguation page is an option being considered, I'm adding to:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Alliance (disambiguation). Remove the WP:DICDEF, and you're basically left with a disambiguation page. I also considered listifying, but we already have a List of military alliances and political alliance is basically just a list on its own. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.