Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alishka Varde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:08, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alishka Varde

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this individual meets the criteria of WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. She has been in two films, and neither were as a leading role. The references provided generally do not discuss her significantly, she is only mentioned as have been in the films or as being related to someone. One reference is about her - an interview regarding her party planning business. Google search for "Alishka Varde" brings up mainly entries in film websites but no significant discussion of her in multiple reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 16:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 16:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 16:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:58, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She acted in two films. According to WP:NACTOR an an actor/actress should have significant (not lead) roles in multiple notable films. She had significant role in Jtyjn according to Indian Express (film review), Hindustan Time (film review) and rediff (film review). For more details, see Jtyjn poster on wiki article. I don't think a person who had a small role in a film would feature on the film poster. She also had significant role in Jhootha Hi Sahi according to sify (film review), rediff (film review) and Indian Express (film review).S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 16:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: S. M. Nazmus Shakib is creator of the article. —usernamekiran(talk) 22:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per norminator. Subject of discussion fails WP:GNG & WP:NACTOR Celestina007 (talk) 18:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even after going through the articles provided by S. M. Nazmus Shakib, I am not convinced that subject's roles were significant. That makes her fail WP:NACTOR. Nominator has already explained why the subject fails general notability criteria. The subject lacks significant coverage. —usernamekiran(talk) 22:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Usernamekiran: Do u have seen the poster of Jtyjn on wiki article and read the reviews of Jhootha Hi Sahi of Sify's third para, rediff review (Alishka Varde, sweet face, terrible dialogue delivery), and the review of Indian Express?--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 23:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@S. M. Nazmus Shakib: hi. Yes. But it is not clear if she has a "significant role". Tertiary maybe. Either way, you are taking "multiple significant" role very casually. It doesnt mean "more than one" or "three". It should be at least 7-8 significant roles. I can understand you are a fan of her, and want to keep her article. But sometimes on wikipedia, we have to avoid taking the policies as their exact wordings, and have to use our own logic. Whether it is about deleting/keeping an article, unblocking a user, or something else :) In this case, the subject fails notability guidelines for actors, as well as general notability criteria. —usernamekiran(talk) 18:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Two or three prominent roles in notable productions are usually enough for significant coverage which is what WP:NACTOR is a guide to, seven or eight roles would only apply to minor roles in very notable productions such as Star Wars, so I disagree with your reconstruction of an established guideline, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some minor coverage, but it is all name drops, cast member lists. Clearly very early in her career. scope_creep^Talk 12:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. She has acted in two films, and neither was in the lead role, Fail WP:NACTOR.-Nahal^(T) 08:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.