Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisha Anand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 17:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alisha Anand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article's two references are both to brief quotes by the article's subject, one on the kind of music played by the radio station she works for and the other for how she feels about the price of a pair of sunglasses she is considering buying. Neither reference is "about" the article's subject. This article requires references that are non-trivial and that are from independent, reliable, verifiable sources to be retained. Quotes about musical tastes and thoughts on sunglasses do not constitute notability. KDS4444^Talk 05:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No real assertion of notability from the sources provided. Does not seem to meet the WP:GNG. Not all radio personalities are notable from the standpoint of an encyclopedia. EricSerge (talk) 10:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poorly sourced, and written very like an advertisement. Makes enough of a claim of notability that a properly written and properly sourced article could potentially be kept, but that fails to describe this article as written. Bearcat (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Nominator should have marked this for CSD. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Searches show it doesn't pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.