Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alireza JJ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Zedbazi. Mergers from history are possible subject to consensus. Sandstein 19:59, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alireza JJ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating on the basis of WP:TNT. I see no evidence he's truly notable but this is a hot heaping mess of spam and garbage sources for a BLP and would require such a significant rewrite and research I think it's best to start from scratch, if he even meets WP:GNG. Praxidicae (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge into Zedbazi per nom. -NightD 16:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. While I understand nightdevil's merge option, I think the need to conform to BLP is more pressing. Merging can take a long time and when we've got an article which is essentially a dump fire full of BLP violations due to all the claims being referenced using unreliable digital redtops, we've got to think about two things.

1. Is there anything which can be merged which has reliable references? In this case, it's a no.
2. Can we be sure that all of the claims are true? In this case, it's a no.

If he eventually becomes notable in his own right then the page could be draftified and any salient claims which could be properly referenced could be saved but currently getting rid of the unreliably sourced information, in this instance basically the whole article, is the most pressing of concerns which is why I'd opt for delete over merge. SITH (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment @StraussInTheHouse: Pinging to clarify things if that was a delete !vote or just a comment. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:18, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.