Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice and the Glass Lake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Of note is that this is essentially a weakish keep result, because WP:NMUSICIAN only states that a subject "may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria". However, the guideline does not provide presumed notability for subjects that meet at least one of the criteria. Also of note is that nobody in the discussion has agreed with deletion after two full relisings. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alice and the Glass Lake

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This conversation has already been carried out previously here. The consensus was that it does meet the WP:NMUSICIAN threshold, even if it only barely. A very quick browse of this article's history or my talk page's history (which I know you have visited) would have revealed that. ~Junedude433 (talk) 02:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There was a prior AfD before an article move, which concluded keep. Notability is forever. Bondegezou (talk) 11:17, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but Clean Up - The musical act achieved some basic stub-level notability as decided in this previous AfD. Back then, I surmised that the article makes the mistake of presenting a personal biography of Ms. Lemke, when it would work better as a history of the musical act called Alice and the Glass Lake. That has not been resolved, but it can be handled as a cleanup process. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a bit of clean up etc. on the article. As I understand it, the musical act called Alice and the Glass Lake is just a stage name for Alice Lemke. I think the basic article structure is fine. Bondegezou (talk) 10:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment she is credited on one song on Revival (Eminem album), which topped a number of charts. I'm not sure if the single credit is enough for WP:NMUSICIAN. Rusalkii (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Her other claim to notability would be her credit as the vocalist for the song "Trip the Light" which plays as the theme for the notable Where the Hell is Matt? 2012 video. This would fall under rule 10 for WP:NMUSICIAN, which being used in conjunction with her credit on an Eminem song, I think establishes notability, in terms of raw music credit. ~Junedude433 (talk) 19:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 02:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.