Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Pagani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  JGHowes  ^talk 13:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Pagani

Alice Pagani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Although I could find a reference after a WP:BEFORE ([1]), it contains little information. Thanks, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 16:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe Alice deserves this page due to the successful show Baby on Netflix she stars in and the 1.1m followers she currently has on instagram, it also informs people about her. Also she is listed on the italian wiki but this is obviously in Italian and not readable by the English audience to the show. Sdurward (talk) 16:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No sources about the subject. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:03, 25 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

@Xxanthippe: Please see below. matt91486 (talk) 09:36, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- There is more substantial Italian language coverage, with large features in both Vanity Fair and Vogue. Other sources are [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. That's just the first five pages of google results. matt91486 (talk) 09:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep in view of the multiple reliable sources coverage in Italian sources as detailed above and others such as Italian Cosmopolitan where she was featured in an article and the front cover, which shows that WP:GNG has been passed and there is no need for deletion, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 16:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - ever filtering out some non-independent content from the interviews, there is still plenty available to show notability. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Matt91486. Passes WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.