Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfonso Plazas Vega Conspiracy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Palace of Justice siege. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alfonso Plazas Vega Conspiracy

Delete Unsourced and poorly written propaganda piece, apparently authored by solidarity campaign (see Yo Creo en Plazas). Any useful material could be added to Palace of Justice siege. RolandR (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge referenced material with Palace of Justice siege. This is only significant in that context. Drawn Some (talk) 14:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
keep the article. The article is new, and was started on May 5th, 2009. After some work on the article, references and different parties have written in the article, plus given references. the article has different websites and videos as references. Also, the piece s not a propaganda piece, but instead states the topic at hand stated in the title. May i remind that the article is open to editing by the public, and other parties are welcome to edit it. Yocreoenplazas (talk • 15:31, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has now been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry. RolandR (talk) 07:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge referenced material with Palace of Justice siege as per Drawn Some. -- Alexf^(talk) 16:11, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any relevant info, delete the rest. Created by a blocked user/sockpuppeteer. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:48, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The editors above voting to merge this article into Palace of Justice siege have apparently not realised that almost all of the material here comes from that article in the first place, and there is nothing to merge. If an editor produces any relevant and reliably sourced material, it can be added to the siege article with no need for thids POV fork. RolandR (talk) 23:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.