Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Zhmodikov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Zhmodikov

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent WP:NPROF/WP:NAUTHOR fail. No article in the Russian Wikipedia. He has a single article on JSTOR [1], with 66 cites per Google Scholar. Prod declined in October 2019. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete an extremely fringe theorist without the widepsread coverage needed to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neither searching for his Romanized name on Google Scholar nor his name in Cyrillic turned up enough citations to pass WP:PROF#C1, and there seems to be no other claim of notability advanced by the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DElete -- Not enough publications to be notable. Even if that hurdle was passed, most of it is in Russian, which will be inaccessible to an English reader. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.