Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Adamescu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:BLOWITUP Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Adamescu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this article would require a total rewrite to be acceptable. it is much too detailed and is clearly an advocacy article. Fails WP:NOTADVOCATE Domdeparis (talk) 15:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per nom. Half the sources, such as they are, deal with the subject's father. The other half are mostly editorials and position papers. Alexander may deserve a line or two in the article on Dan, but nothing really suggests he's independently notable. Anyway, the article as it stands is fatally flawed, an endless screed against the Romanian government, so WP:BLOWITUP applies. - Biruitorul ^Talk 21:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.