Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aletta Ocean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aletta Ocean

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Won an award, sells her body for $1000 an.. Er.. Pop. That doesn't feel like a good BLP when there are no reliable sources. Fails GNG and ENT Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete total lack of reliable sources leads to afailure of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:45, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Many of us could say, “I’ve heard of her” but that doesn’t count. Reliable sources required. Trillfendi (talk) 21:03, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Beyard508 (talk) 00:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC) Confirmed sock puppet user - striking vote. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:BASIC and WP:ENT. Lacks significant coverage by independent reliable source coverage. My independent search for RS coverage found only celebrity sightings, trivial mentions and promotional releases. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Through the Google News search, I found the following articles that feature her [1] [2] [3]. They, the multiple multiple briefer mentions from those Google News links plus brief acknowledgements in an academic journal [4] mean she passes WP:BASIC. I don't know why they cover her but they do. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:39, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage from Hungarian sources since she's Hungarian. [5] [6] The second link documents that Ocean has the fifth most popular twitter account from Hungary which suggest she has a sizable following under WP:ENT. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:12, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage ≠ sources passing the GNG and none of what you put forward cuts the mustard. Certainly none of it is going to rigoriously source a BLP. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:17, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is so amazing that you can so quickly review and deny the reliability of those foreign language newspapers and magazines like Il Gazzettino, Affaritaliani.it, and Central Mediacsoport Zrt. (G7.hu). Sources that are currently used to support biographies on wikipedia. [7],[8] Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:49, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and most of the references show little coverage. Syndicater (talk) 22:10, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I tried to evaluate the sources reported by Morbidthoughts. Of the first three, two are simple clickbait without substantive content regarding the article subject, while the other, at mundiario.com, was composed of text like this (per Google translate): "The carpets in the hallway burned when Aletta and Hitomi left their splendid dressing room and climbed into the monsoon taxi that dragged them to the gallows on Boobs Square. There were the hyenas, with their gibbous anatomies and their inscrutable eyes. A ray of hope stopped the suicide of the penguins in the same district." Such remarkable prose may make Donald Trump's twitter feed read like Emily Dickinson, but it's not reliable sourcing, even regarding the suicidal penguins. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.