Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Keeler Principle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seicer | talk | contribs 05:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Keeler Principle

Non-notable philosophy which has been madeup by brotherseinstein.com/. It appears to be a hoax created by Broseinstein (talk · contribs) who appears to be the operator of that website. Also, the "Albert Keeler Principle" highlighted in yellow links directly to User:Broseinstein. Cunard (talk) 02:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as hoax. Drmies (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, there is no official provision for such. Still, most clueful admins invoke WP:IAR when presented with a CSD tag on a blatant, vandalistic hoax article. Hooray for unnecessary process. Can the next admin that sees this go ahead and do the honors? Bullzeye^{(Ring for Service)} 04:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged the article with {{db-vandalism}} which I should have done instead of taking it to AfD. Cunard (talk) 05:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It cannot be constued as vandalism in any way. Yes, it's probably non-notable, and yes, there's a conflict of interest, but you'll just have to wait for this AFD to close. Wily D 13:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both this and the user page which is a duplicate. JuJube (talk) 06:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nonsense hoax. Stifle (talk) 12:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.