Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alana Soares

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alana Soares (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article iis an uncited stub Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG,nothing in the text that shows any Wikipedia:Notability (people) Off2riorob (talk) 01:00, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Multiple mainstream appearances. Dekkappai (talk) 03:42, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I realize this is part of a good faith mass nomination by Off2riorob, so I am posting basically the same comment on all of them. I understand that WP:PORNBIO was changed recently via Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)/Archive_2010#RFC:_Every_playmate_is_notable but I don't think that outcome necessarily reflected true consensus. The bright line rule of "every playmate gets an article" was much easier to administer and reduced editor overhead time, instead of us spending lots of time deciding that some (most?) playmates get articles and a few get shuffled off into some "playmates of 200x" article. I guess we'll see, if these articles get deleted, whether they get successively recreated. (see also AfDs of 2010 playmates now pending, among others most by same nominator, I think). I went back to see what the actual track record is here, and I don't see an AfD for a playmate that resulted in a delete since the summer of 2004 (and there's only one!) I guess WP:PORNBIO eventually was edited to say that playmates are considered notable to reflect what the AfDs were showing and thus avoid pointless debates. See:

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Stephanie Heinrich (Aug 04 - appears it was a delete, article was recreated in July 05 and not been challenged since)

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Audra Lynn (Oct. 04 keep)

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Dalene Kurtis (Dec. 04 keep)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmella DeCesare (Feb 05 keep)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Waite (April 06 keep)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Liz_Stewart (March 07 keep)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marliece Andrada (Sept 07 keep) (Closer comment: "Absent stronger evidence, there is a longstanding consensus that all Playboy centerfolds are notable, given the fame of the publication both within and without its genre.")

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Evenson (May 08 keep)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charlotte Kemp (Jan 10 keep)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Carrington (Feb 10 keep)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Pilgrim (model) (March 10 keep)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margie Harrison (March 10 keep)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colleen Farrington (March 10 keep)

--Milowent (talk) 04:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Dekkappai. Dismas|^(talk) 04:39, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - as per Milowent. My compliments to this editor for his memory on this issue. --Morenooso (talk) 04:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes WP:PORNBIO per mainstream appearances. Epbr123 (talk) 11:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Sourced, with multiple mainstream appearances. Arskwad (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:ENT, WP:PORNBIO (which really shouldn't apply), and WP:GNG. Despite the claims made here, she has no significant mainstream appearances -- the Beverly Hills Cop role is as one of more than a dozen Playboy models in a crowd scene at Hefner's mansion; the other role, "Twin in Car," is barely more than an extra's job. No evidence she's even had an onscreen line. GNews hits are almost all classified ads for car and boat shows. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep by the general consensus for playmates of the month. DGG ( talk ) 07:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.