Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Mashhad News (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sourcing has not been identified Star Mississippi 15:42, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Al Mashhad News

Al Mashhad News (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Soft deleted at AfD in September, then restored. Notability stills looks highly doubtful to me - plenty of launch PR but no real in depth coverage in RIS. Mccapra (talk) 07:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Arab Emirates. Mccapra (talk) 07:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The previously-soft-deleted version was undeleted "to better the article" but the references are those considered in the previous AfD. It was then moved to draft with the comment "Likely COI, resubmit through AfC" but then just moved back. Repeating my delete rationale from the previous discussion: An article based on announcement coverage for a new start-up "which comes to light before the end year" and featuring uncited claims to notability. (The same new editing account has also created a similar Draft:Al Mashhad Channel on the same venture.) The referenced coverage fails WP:CORPDEPTH; I am not seeing evidence that this particular "Al Mashhad" venture meets WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 08:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:15, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: The the page has huge credibility and notability in the non English speaking space with a plethora of Arabic sources and English sources. If the only criteria is only English sources we will miss out on a lot of credible non English entities , regional businesses and articles. The page is immensely notable in Arabic and English with credible sources in Arabic and English . It is a notable entity in the non English and Arabic speaking world as well as English (Yubabaogino (talk) 07:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Can you link to some examples of the plethora of reliable Arabic sources please? Mccapra (talk) 08:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.