Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alíz Derekas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect (WP:NACD) CTJF83 chat 17:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Co-discoverer of an asteroid. Co. Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you: BLP½E. JBsupreme (talk) 10:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 12:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 12:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Co-delete per nom. :) Chutznik (talk) 19:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete she is named in the 82092 Kalocsa article, that's enough wikifame by half ¨¨ victor falk 21:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 82092 Kalocsa per WP:BIO1E. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. MiRroar (talk) 18:16, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 82092 Kalocsa. No point in deleting this. Warrah (talk) 23:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per David Eppstein, but kudos for the hilarious nomination statement. :) Ray^Talk 08:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A search in Hungarian Wikipedia for Derekas aliz turns up 12 results: http://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speci%C3%A1lis%3AKeres%C3%A9s&redirs=1&search=Derekas+aliz&fulltext=Search&searchengineselect=mediawiki&ns0=1 I can't read (thus evaluate) these, but they might bear on notability. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 15:13, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.