Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akilam nine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 01:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Akilam nine

Akilam nine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Though this is a Book of a scripture Akilattirattu Ammanai, independent notability of the book is questionable. Unreferenced since 2009. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 08:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is a mythology related article based on Ayyavazhi Mythology. This event is elobrated in Akilathirattu Ammanai, the holy book of Ayyavazhi. More over the event is well elaborated in the books which are mentioned in the reference section. Also there are no different views over the same event for different authors. So no inline citations are needed repeatedly. - Vaikunda Raja:talk: 09:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and maybe create a Redirect to Akilathirattu Ammanai. Pretty much all the set of characters and ancillary texts should be dealt with this way as there isn't any scholarly research or general notability for them, anything stemming from the Ayyavazi/their book alone. —SpacemanSpiff 15:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep As with Akilam one if the references listed at the end of the article are in line with criteria no.3 of WP:NB - The book has been considered by reliable sources to have made a significant contribution to a notable or significant motion picture, or other art form, or event or political or religious movement. - better if the refs are incorporated into the article. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:03, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.