Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhil Ennamsetty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 08:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akhil Ennamsetty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No encyclopedic significance, as demonstrated by the lead sentence which tells us only where he studied. He was shortlisted for an internal Edinburgh University alumni award, the non-notable Being Edinburgh, and he featured in a news article as the first person in his state (not the world, not even India) to donate plasma for use in convalescent plasma therapy: praiseworthy but not indicating that he should have an article in the encyclopedia. WP:BLP1E perhaps. Article was previously PRODded but was DePRODded by an IP as part of an edit where the only comment was "Fixed fact". PamD 07:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PamD 07:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. PamD 07:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: No evidence of notability. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 15:59, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Akhil was already mentioned under American Association for the Advancement of Science

  Akhil was already mentioned under American Association for the Advancement of Science. Then a page was created. Currently it is too short, but should not be deleted. --Bernburgerin (talk) 20:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Bernburgerin: Thanks for drawing my attention to the article American Association for the Advancement of Science which needs a lot of work - unsourced content including "recently" etc. Ennamsetty was mentioned in unsourced content added by an IP in 2015. If that was the source for the statement you included in his article, you might like to check for a more up to date and reliable source. Or amend it to read "was in 2015". Though even that would need a source. PamD 07:15, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: agree with the nominator. Lacks notability. Couldn’t find anything except that he donated plasma defcon5 (talk) 06:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom and as per all above. Fails GNG Purosinaloense T/K 14:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.