Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajitabha Bose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 06:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ajitabha Bose

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage found in the references. The ones with a paragraph or two are neither national papers nor reputed regional papers. Some of the articles are written by the subject himself. Dial911 (talk) 16:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Dial911 (talk) 16:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NAUTHOR.[1][2] TheodoreIndiana (talk) 06:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see no qualification for Notable Author criteria or WP:GNG. These two sources you cited don't justify significant coverage on the person. And they might not be independent as well. Dial911 (talk) 23:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 18:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 18:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 18:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Favonian (talk) 18:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Lack WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG. Qualifies WP:TOOSOON. -Hatchens (talk) 04:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - at best, this is too soon Spiderone 15:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.