Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airedale High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Kurykh 01:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Airedale High School

I would not consider either positive OFSTED reports, or similar feedback, nor meeting Jamie Oliver, particularly notable - the former is not uncommon, and there's been a veritable plague of the latter. Essentially, I don't think that this school is really notable. SamBC 06:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable, nothing much to distinguish it from most other UK schools. List of teachers, etc. is little more than directory information. Robotforaday 12:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable enough, should NOT be deleted. And don't go citing arguments about its lack of notability, it doesn't sway with me. --Molag Bal (I'm back, and no-one bans me!) 12:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, would you like to cite an argument about the alleged notablity of the subject? Robotforaday 13:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Struck through as a self confessed sock of a banned user. --pgk 14:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No apparent reason why this article has been singled out, as high schools are legitimate subjects. Hawkestone 12:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you point to a policy or guideline that says that? WP:OUTCOMES says simply: "Schools are frequently nominated for deletion, but consensus is frequently not reached. Most of the approximately 270 school articles nominated for deletion in the eight months January to August 2005, resulted in no consensus, with fewer than 15% actually deleted." This simply suggests that there is no overall consensus, meaning that the subject is still very much up for discussion. Otherwise, your argument appears to be a case of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. SamBC 15:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I will put this article through the criteria in WP:SCHOOL: Not the focus of many non-trivial publications; not recognition for their methods of instruction; has no notable history or architecture. Yeah, it's basically not notable enough, and nothing is referenced, should go. tdmg 20:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete patently NN, and very poorly written to boot. What a crap article. VanTucky ^(talk) 23:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I wouldnt call it crap--I would call it desperate straining after anything possible--joining with 250 other schools in a festival. ingenious, but not sufficient. DGG (talk) 01:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. — But|seriously|folks 05:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunately not appropriate for Wikipedia. I wish there was a wiki of schools that I could suggest but I cannot find one at the moment. Cedars 07:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn school as above. Eusebeus 10:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep because all high schools are notable, as I argue User:Noroton/opinions, although User:Husond or some other closing admin may come along to again disenfranchise me. Noroton 03:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.