Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Abdel Haye Kira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:18, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Abdel Haye Kira

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search for references found no published (gBooks) references for this subject, fails WP:N and WP:V. Prod removed with comment "rm prod. i suspect sources can be found with alternative spellings, so afd might be more useful". Article is about one of the most wanted underground fighters during the British occupation of Egypt Jeepday (talk) 14:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also unable to find any sources, odd for such a notorious fellow.Slatersteven (talk) 15:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - given that no reliable sources can be found to verify the content in the article. Anotherclown (talk) 08:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it lacks reliable sources. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:39, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources as set out in the WP:GNG. Happy to change my opinion if appropriate sources can be found. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice per AR: just no evidence of notability (yet). bahamut0013^words _deeds 00:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.