Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aftertaste

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 08:07, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aftertaste

A dictdef that has been marked {{move to Wiktionary}} three times, was transwikied, and is now happily living in a totally rewritten form at wikt:aftertaste. I can't think of anywhere to usefully redirect this, and I'm tired of taking it back out of Category:Copy to Wiktionary. —Cryptic (talk) 01:26, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• comment; I'm not entirely sure it can't be expanded beyond a dicdef - principally what chemically causes aftertaste? What foods are especially good at creating aftertaste? How does it vary between people? [1] [2]. Dunc|☺ 01:48, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: the "Definition" heading is inviting the {{move to wiktionary}} tag. Perhaps it would be more helpful to remove it and turn it into a stub of some sort. Flowerparty ^talk 02:11, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, expand. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-08-15 02:34
• Delete. I cannot envision how this article could possibly be expanded into something beyond the simple dicdef it is now. I'll happily change my vote if proven wrong. Fernando Rizo T/C 02:43, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Well look at that, I'm wrong. Nicely done, Christopher. Fernando Rizo T/C 06:33, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• possible keep aftertaste is another term for finish in winetasting and hence a category of evaluation. This might make it more than dictionary entry (?) Dottore So 03:58, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, expanded per above. Christopher Parham (talk) 05:17, 2005 August 15 (UTC)
  • well done (expanded the entry) Dottore So 05:34, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the rewrite. Notable topic in... now what is the science of wine called...? Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:35, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oenology, I think (do we have a stub category for that?)--Doc (?) 11:39, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:46, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We've got {{wine-stub}}. Aecis 18:47, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep nice start, I'll be glad to add the beer point of reference also. Allegrorondo 13:11, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, valid concept. Lots of foods have aftertastes also. And it's a recognised problem with certain medicines and tablets. Proto t c 14:29, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Well done Christopher Parham. Capitalistroadster 15:52, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Aecis 18:47, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. —Encephalon | ^ζ 22:24:51, 2005-08-15 (UTC)
• Split - merge alcohol section with beer, wine, and whiskey (the separate paragraphs, that is), and transwiki the rest to wikitionary. Hosterweis (talk) (contribs) 01:08, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and expand. Alex.tan 03:02, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.