Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghanistan women's national cricket team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan women's national cricket team

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet WP:GNG for notability. Bhtpbank (talk) 16:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: - Evidence of non trivial coverage in reliable sources - [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. These just from the first page of a google search. Clavdia chauchat (talk) 21:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the above sources. I'd be interested to know why the nominator thinks that the articles fails WP:GNG. Or is this a case of WP:BEFORE not being followed? St Anselm (talk) 22:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per the above sources, as well as the subject matter further meeting WP:CRIN as it is about a national cricket team. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 23:26, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Keep - The topic clearly passes WP:GNG. Sources presented above by User:Clavdia chauchat qualify the topic's notability. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Every one of the sources pointed out by Clavdia chauchat has this as the primary topic; coverage is both significant, and from multiple reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.