Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghanistan Pakistan People's Friendship Association (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Does not pass WP:GNG at this time.

Thank you everyone for participating and assuming good faith! If you disagree with this closure, please take your concerns to Deletion Review prior to my talk page. Thanks again and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 01:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan Pakistan People's Friendship Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable organization with very little information from any web page, article, etc... that could be found mentioning this organization. And if it does, it's done in passing. The last Afd from thirteen years ago still presents the same issues that was found back in 2008 just as much now in 2021. The article fails GNG. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Now this article has many references from:

I tried to improve this article today. Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And yet they either mention the organization once or in passing. Nothing about the organization itself. Still doesn't pass notability. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – the sources in the article do not provide significant coverage sufficient to meet WP:NORG, and my searches are coming up empty. If additional foreign-language coverage is identified I'm glad to reevaluate, but until then I'm thinking that the organization isn't notable. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.