Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced manufacturing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced manufacturing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like an essay and gives no coherent definition of the term. I don't see anything that suggests this is a widely accepted term with an accepted definition distinct from other, similar, terms. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• delete All manufacturing innovations are advanced technology— at first; the phrase is vacuous. Mangoe (talk) 22:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Vague term that could describe anything manufacturing-related at all. I could see this being a worthwhile article if it gave the term a coherent definition, but all we have is vapid slop like "The purpose of such activities is to add value to achieve targeted objectives." Content-free drivel and mostly unsourced to boot. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The subject is just a vague generic phrase. The sources are equally generic and the style is not encyclopedic. Anton.bersh (talk) 20:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.