Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advaiya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No good arguments or references to keep are presented. Drmies (talk) 02:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Advaiya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Non-notable company, a promotional content referenced from low quality references. Fails to highlight, its contributions. Ireneshih (talk) 13:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional piece created by User:Vishal0soni, who has WP:COI, check here.Ireneshih (talk) 14:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ireneshih (talk). I believe that this page follows all appropriate guidelines and carries sufficient notability as per Wikipedia norms. Also, when creating this page, i had followed the AfC process, and tried to address several valuable feedback received during creation. Regarding the Conflict of Interest, i have never tried to hide any such fact, and i have clearly specified this on my user page as well. The fact is that before this conversation, i din't even knew about such WP:COI policy. If you still feel some wrong practice were followed, i request you to share your thoughts and feedback regarding the mentioned issue with article Advaiya and provide some suggestions about how can i help improve quality of this article and Wikipedia as whole.

User:Vishal0soni, Can you please provide me the details of contributions that makes you think that your company deserves an encyclopedic place. How it has served industry to make it a better place? Looking at the details, it one of millions companies that works on client's outsourcing projects with a single motive to make money. How about Manish Godha page, why do you feel these are encyclopedic topics? You have not only conflict of interest, but I have found that most of your other articles are written from personal point of view. It clear from here, that you have been editing the page with your Company owner's instructions ie removing one owner name and changing employee strength from 60 to 80. Can you please clarify why one owner was removed from the page? Or is it because the other owner asked to remove him. Your company has no contributions to be included in the Wikipedia, this is certainly not a place to promote your company which is similar to every Microsoft partner company.

No major news mentions and it looks like a puffery. Created by a possible spammer with WP:COI arguments, Salt and burn Ireneshih (talk) 06:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ireneshih (talk). There are several aspects due to which i believe that articles like Advaiya should get a place on Wikipedia. This company has a very good local presence, and is working on my initiatives of great importance (maybe not at international level, but for national level). For this reason, it has got coverage from many national level media channels like India Infoline Ltd, EconomicTimes, ITVoice, EFY Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and so on. It has a employed over 150 employees over a history of over 10 years (ref: https://www.linkedin.com/company/3235279?trk=prof-exp-company-name). Moreover, in this article, i have not focused on any marketing promotions, but tried to highlight the key initiatives like ActionUdaipur, that brings good change in the society, and AdvaiyaLabs, that involves innovative work with globally renowned institutions like Indian Institute of Management Udaipur.

Also, we take this article as a part of a bigger initiative. Actually our aim is to promote information and awareness about Udaipur related topics, including its locations, tourism, economy etc. To cover the economy aspect, we plan to cover many other similar organizations having good regional presence and impact, including many competitors of Advaiya (see Template:Companies_based_in_Udaipur for details). I have added your suggestions as guidelines, which we will be following during future efforts. Please let us know if we can do anything else to further improve the quality of these articles. Vishal0soni (talk) 09:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vishal0soni, To be honest, I complete disagree to your statement that company is notable. There are no contributions, that makes Advaiya notable, Infact there are mere mentions in your said sources. Following are the answers to your statements

Hey Ireneshih(talk). I noticed all the edits made by you in past few days, and i think i got the point you imply. I think there is some difference in perception about notability and reliability of content sources. What i feel is reliable and notable, may not hold same trust levels for you. I had marked all the content with appropriate references, but i think i would need to provide some more 'reliable' reference to match up with your expectations, for which i might need some more time. but here are the answers for your questions:

1. This company has a very good local presence, and is working on my initiatives of great importance (maybe not at international level, but for national level). Ans:- Do you have any reliable source to prove it?

Here are a few ( i guess all local sources for now)

2. It has a employed over 150 employees over a history of over 10 years (ref: https://www.linkedin.com/company/3235279?trk=prof-exp-company-name). Ans:- Do you have any reliable source to prove it? How does it makes your company eligible for an encyclopedic entry?

Here is something that might match your required levels notability:

3. But tried to highlight the key initiatives like ActionUdaipur, that brings good change in the society, and AdvaiyaLabs, Ans:- Do you have any reliable source to prove it? If yes, how they have been appreciated by the national and international media?

I think there are still some sources that were not included in original article, but not sure if they satisfies your definition of reliability:

| Action Udaipur – Makeover of a city
Bus stand cleaned under ActionUdaipur Initiative
ActionUdaipur: Sardarpura Park gets new life
Register for ‘Green Clean City’ Initiative
[Advaiya Labs announced as the technology mentor for IIMU PRARAMBH-2015 http://www.franchiseindia.com/entrepreneur/news/Advaiya-Labs-announced-as-the-technology-mentor-for-IIMU-PRARAMBH-2015-6024/]

It looks like you are very active in Udaipur, my next question is when you are going to create article for much bigger companies like Arcgate and eConnect nearby to your own WP:COI company. Are you looking to create similar promotional articles for these companies as well? Advaiya is a non-notable company and very similar promotional piece created by you for its founder Manish Godha, for which you again have a COI. I have spent a much longer time and digged into the details before moving it to WP:AFD. Please explain all contributions that makes your Boss's company notable.

My suggestion will be to read wikipedia policies mentioned on your talk page here, before adding any more spam or non-reliable content. I have reviewed Template:Companies_based_in_Udaipur, where no IT company qualifies for a WIkipedia page. Please do not create pages by adding Udaipur to their name as they already have a Wikipedia page. If you want, please go ahead and expand the current pages instead of creating Duplicate pages. Example Amkette. Remember Wikipedia is not a place to promote businesses. Ireneshih (talk) 07:19, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as I also said of Manish Godha, searches found links at News and browser but nothing for better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.