Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriana Molinari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, default to keep. I can't see this converging towards a consensus. Sometimes AfDs of BLPs will end up with "no consensus default to delete", but that doesn't apply here: nobody in this discussion worried about BLP issues, and the OTRS ticket from 2013 implied that the subject didn't mind having a Wikipedia article. Deryck C. 20:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adriana Molinari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blp1e for being stripped of a patent title for .. Er .. stripping. Beyond that utterly non-notable. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - notable, she was a Penthouse Pet and appeared on the TV show A Current Affair. Subtropical-man talk
  (en-2) 23:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

neither of which are notable and this doesn't address the blp1e issue. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom fails WP:PORNBIO + WP:GNG .–Davey2010^Talk 17:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of Penthouse Pets - While I haven't done a fair amount of in-depth research on the subject of this AfD here, the best course of action for this article at this time appears to be to a redirect. Guy1890 (talk) 03:35, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd be happy with that, Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Does not meet the general notability guideline. --Inother (talk) 11:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The GNG is just about coverage in reliable, independent sources (i.e. references), which this article seems to have enough of. The WP:BLP1E issue is something separate. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 15:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - She passes the GNG. BLP1E does not apply to her as she was not a low profile individual. Also a porn career of two years is not exactly one event. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:48, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Brief coverage for being a state pageant winner losing her crown because of adult magazine appearance, falling afoul of WP:BLP1E. The event itself is non-notable...no 1991 Adriana Molinari pageant crown controversy exists or will ever exist, and an otherwise non-notable person who would not be discussed absent the 1 event. Tarc (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Molinari meets the GNG. She had three separate instances of news coverage -- when she became Miss New Hampshire, when her title was taken away, and years later when she went into porn. The newspaper column used as an article reference is a good example of the sort of coverage she received, and provides more reliable substantive information than the sources in a typical porn bio here dso, by a wide margin. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 02:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Three instances, first the stripped beauty title, then a penthouse pet winner, then as an adult film star, seems to meet the GNG. Three things add up. GuzzyG (talk) 18:00, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • What policy are you basing this bunch of assertions on? The first is the 1 in BLP1E. The second Penthouse is not a competiotion and you don't get a page here for being in it and thirdly Porn is not a reason for anyone to have a page. This person is notable for 1 event and that's what BLP1E was written for. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:06, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails to meet general notability guidelines. Her title being removed can be mentioned in the article on the New Hampshire pageant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). This article passes WP:GNG and also crosses the threshold of notability.WP:N Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 11:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but her IMDB page shows a different date of birth?C E (talk) 16:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.