Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adios Vaya Con Dios (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adios Vaya Con Dios

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NFILM. The sources are spam/SEO work and PR pieces Praxidicae (talk) 13:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM due to lacking sustained WP:SIGCOV in multiple independent reliable sources. The article was created by an editor indef blocked a few days after creating this article, most of whose edits were struck for copy-vio issues. Was already deleted once before in a well-attended AfD for lacking notability. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 09:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Stifle's persuasive argument on the results of the previous AfD. Ifnord (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.