Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adhikārivāda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adhikārivāda

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG the word only has passing mentions in books related to Swami Vivekananda where he criticized this Hindu doctrine Explained at Wikisource. The creator is blocked for multiple copyright violations. Venkat TL (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The book cited only has a single page that mentions this topic, and as such could not possibly count as "significant coverage". Some of this content could possibly be merged into an article about the author of that book, but tbh I'm skeptical that there is anything worth preserving here. Salimfadhley (talk) 22:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.