Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addobbati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WITHDRAWN BY NOM. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 18:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addobbati

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails MOS:DABENTRY and MOS:DABRL. Has only two entries, one of which is a redlink. Bbb23 (talk) 22:03, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Redirect~~ Keep to Giuseppe Addobbati. If Aldo Addobbati is created they can be disambiguated with hat notes. Unless information on the surname itself can be added, this functions more as a DAB page than a surname page.--kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:15, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well that was fast. :) --kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:29, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think Blofeld practices the think method used in The Music Man. He just thinks there's a new article and it happens. Hey, Dr. B, are you going to create an article for the revolutionary, too? We wouldn't want that redlink entry lying around.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to keep (for what should be obvious reasons). --kelapstick^(bainuu) 00:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, economic historian, I initially got French revolutionary somehow LOL.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. B, are you going to do something about "Cavalieri Addobbati — a name for Italian knights, also known as Cavalieri di Corredo"? There shouldn't be a redlinked entry, but I wasn't sure if you were done.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Patience Bbbb23 is a virtue.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

keep: populated now Sasha (talk) 00:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: it is populated now with 3 articles that look legit, but I agree with Bbb23 about the redlink.--William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 01:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Legit dab page.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If someone wants to close this as keep, I withdraw the nom.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: legitimate surname page, rather than dab page, and now identified as such. PamD 18:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.