Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addie Walsh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Addie Walsh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP relies upon a single source with many sections left unreferenced. I have completed a quick search for additional sources, though I couldn't find anything aside from IMDb and other unreliable sources. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:11, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:17, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Meets WP:CREATIVE. Credited writer/head writer/etc for more than 1000 episodes of notable soap operas. Verifiable multiple-time winner of multiple well-known awards for multiple shows (WGA Award, Daytime Emmy) (eg [1][2][3]). —siroχo 09:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per reasoning above. Kazamzam (talk) 19:29, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No proper relevant sources. Is using only one reference. killer bee  09:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - the lack of sources is not a reason for deletion (see Wikipedia:Introduction to deletion process). Regardless, I have added in sources for some of the statements in the article. I have no comment on notability. DaffodilOcean (talk) 12:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi, DaffodilOcean! You're right that lack of sources on a page is not a cause for deletion in and of itself. However, if sources cannot be found, the subject of the article doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. As such, the subject would not require a Wikipedia page. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree. DaffodilOcean (talk) 19:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Sources exist to verify notability as defined by WP:CREATIVE. Rublamb (talk) 14:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.