Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Active recall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Fails WP:V and, although a notable topic, consensus is this article needs to be rewritten in its entirety. → AA ^(talk) — 13:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Active recall

I'm nominating this article to be deleted because of its unencyclopedic content/style and complete lack of sources. I tagged it to be rewritten on 8 September 2007 and since nothing has been done to improve the article by its original authors since then, I assumed this was the next most logical step. RobertM525 07:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:25, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Learning There should be coverage of this principle in the articles on learning, but the author should have at least grabbed another encyclopedia or a psychology book. Notable topic, worthless article. No objection to someone doing a little research and writing a good article. The Learning article is very poorly referenced itself. Edison 14:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article needs to be rewritten, but the topic is notable. IP198 19:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thing is, no one was going to rewrite it. So it may as well be deleted until someone feels like writing an article on "active recall" rather than a study guide for one. (I get the feeling this was copied-and-pasted from some outside source, too.) RobertM525 03:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.