Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Girlz Racing (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Data Design Interactive. Sandstein 21:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Action Girlz Racing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been nominated before. I don't know what the standards were for games then, but this has very, very poor coverage, none of which is really in-depth anyway; the "deepest" thing is a few paragraphs of review on IGN. So, delete for lack of notability; no reliable sources with in-depth discussion. Drmies (talk) 02:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While I loved reading the review from IGN, and the fact that the game appears to be about as relevant as a bad smelling fart, and about as well liked, it does have significant third party sources referencing the game, which would appear to make it meet the GNG. Fbifriday (talk) 04:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uncontroversial redirect to its developer, Data Design Interactive. The sources in the article are no bueno: GameFAQs, MobyGames, etc. are unreliable video game sources, though they can sometimes point to where sources can be found. The only reliable coverage of this game is the IGN review. So move the ref to the parent article and cover the game there summary style. There is no sourced-based rationale for keeping it separate. czar 20:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:04, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Data Design Interactive. I've gone through Goodsearch, Mobygames, GameFAQs, Metacritic, and GameSpot, and turned up nothing of use beyond the IGN review. With some real deep digging we might find a bare minimum of sources for the article, but the game is one of many bargain bin titles released for the PC, PlayStation 2, Wii, and every other top-selling games platform, and it's just not possible for Wikipedia to produce decent articles on even half of them.--Martin IIIa (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.