Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acodez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Acodez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't seem like a notable company. The references here are all press releases or quote spamming without real significant coverage. I can't find evidence that the AVA Digital Award is actually notable and I'm not certain about Silicon India and all the other awards here. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article fails WP:Company. JackTracker (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not yet better satisfying the applicable notability, still questionable. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article is not in accordance to WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH policies. Most of the references mentioned do not talk about the company in particular and can be considered as "Passing Mention" sources. Three of the sources for awards have their domain names starting with the word "enter." and hence from the same source. Sanket Edits Wiki (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.