Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accompany

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accompany

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

trivial company, and the references are mere notices or press releases. Written by an apparently undeclared paid editor DGG ( talk ) 01:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This seems like it was created as PR for a small non-notable company. Shelbystripes (talk) 01:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable company that fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Due to there being many PR firms in existence and the article subject being not particularly notable, fails WP:MILL.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article subject fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The article seems very promotional. Bythebooklibrary (talk) 22:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable at best and blatant promotion at worst - also not within WP:CORPDEPTH. Bryan C. W. (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.