Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abid Chohan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 20:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Under WP:BIO it says that a politician must either be "Political figures holding international, national or statewide/provincewide office or members of a national, state or provincial legislature" or "Major local political figures who receive (or received) significant press coverage". Manchester City council is not a legislature and no evidence has been provided that there is significant press coverage for this figure. Are councillors on substantial councils inherently notable? JASpencer 17:48, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The article is a stub, but I would be inclined to keep him as a member of a notable city council. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 18:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No ex-officio encyclopedic notability for a ward councillor (or even for a city council member, I would argue). This person is not a councillor representing the whole of Manchester. He's one of three[1] councillors for Longsight ward i.e. a small segment of Manchester city. There are 32 wards in Manchester city, each with 3 councillors (so 96 in total)[2]. In 2001, Longsight had a population of 16,000[3] - about 3.8% of Manchester city's total residents in 2001[4] or about 0.6% of the total Greater Manchester urban population of 2.5 million[5]. Bwithh 19:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Bwithh. Local politician of no particular notability. Ohconfucius 13:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per Bwithh. -- Kicking222 13:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Would it be better to merge this with Longsight, his ward? JASpencer 13:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment 2 He was put in a batch of councillors at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester councillors, but there were differences within the batch. There was also a failed concensus here. JASpencer 14:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Local authority councillors with no other notability do not need an article. David | Talk 14:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete: only 200 google hits; no reason presented to keep article. John Broughton 18:29, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Local councillors not automatically notable. Espresso Addict 09:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.