Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Dutta

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Dutta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sourcing is really thin and I'm not seeing WP:GNG. Marquardtika (talk) 03:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 18:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AmericanAir88(talk) 15:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The subject is not notable. The man wrote a thesis, won an award (NIASA), was nominated for one, NDTV Good Times showcased some of his works, and he received a Certificate of Appreciation from IIA. The first reference attests that the subject was "nominated amongst the top 50 next generation Indian architects" (not encyclopedia notable) and the next three (one IIA and two NIASA) are primary sources on non-encyclopedia significant awards. I am sure there are many "thousands" of field specific "national awards" in India so I can see nothing being "worthy of notice" or "note" – that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia as a written account of that person's life.".
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.